Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

2015 Skincare Part One, a Cautionary Tale



Note: I love Maybelline New York products. I think they have the awesome vibrant lipsticks in the market. Their mascaras are amazing. This is a rant on just one product. Unfortunately, this not only didn't work for me but it almost ruined my skin.

I've talked a lot about makeup but I don't think I ever touched on skincare. I admit, I haven't been paying much attention to skincare until recently. I've always had good skin; never had acne (as we all know it... not even during adolescence, truth), toed the line between normal to oily skin, no severe reactions to products and season. So yeah, I've been lucky.

Until I tried the Maybelline Baby Skin primer last month. I'm one of those people who think that face primers are NOT a must-have item. I actually think that it's not necessary. My experience with the Maybelline Baby Skin primer was the final nail on the coffin.

You see, I'm not a fan of matte skin. Or matte anything. I like my skin to look dewy. I read somewhere that using primers can help with that as well as with the staying power of any foundation and/or similar base makeup products. Armed with a $3-off coupon, I decided to try the most readily available primer at the drugstore. From the get-go, I did not like the silicone-y feel of it between my fingers. It's almost too slippery. And the way it dries to a powder-y consistency didn't feel comfortable at all. It was like my skin felt numb. I would rub and I couldn't feel a thing. But I soldiered on and went about with my usual makeup routine. Mind you, I don't wear foundation that often - if, at all - and I'm pretty versed with BB creams. Using an Asian BB cream that I knew worked very well on me, I put it on top of the Baby Skin primer. The icky powder silicone texture made my BB cream application too slimy. Within the first hour, I felt dry patches on my face. Every time I passed by a reflective surface, I thought I looked awful. My base makeup was patchy and my concealers creased and balled up. I felt ugly. When I took my makeup off at the end of the day, I already had the beginnings of rosacea on my cheeks.

However, I didn't attribute these horrible things to the primer yet. I thought the unusual dryness of my skin was just because of the changing seasons. But then I noticed my skin drying up. I use a cleansing oil to remove my makeup so the dryness, I thought was strange. And then like a fool, I decided to give Maybelline Baby Skin another go.

I had a formal party to go to at the end of February and I wanted to practice makeup looks. Plus, I bought a new foundation (my first one in probably 10 years) to use for the occasion. I wanted a smooth base for my makeup plus the foundation said it has a dewy finish. I tolerated the icky feel, used my Beauty Blender to apply my foundation, and I thought it looked great. (L'Oreal True Match Lumi, hallelujah!) But like before, the makeup started breaking down after an hour or so. It started feeling uncomfortable way before that. We went on a late night Walmart run that same night and under the harsh white lights at Walmart, I could see all the lines and patches and dryness on my face. I couldn't even look people in the eye without thinking that they will see the hot mess on my face.

Same story when I took the makeup off. Rosacea was back and unlike the previous one with just rash-like redness, this round had bumps and whiteheads. The next day, I discovered flaky and peeling skin on my face. That was the very first time in my life that I had that skin problem. Needless to say, I panicked. My formal party was about a week from that incident and I had to fix it fast.

Right then and there, I decided never to use Maybelline Baby Skin primer ever again. I looked at my face and man, never have I regretted a purchase this much. I don't wish it to my greatest enemy either. Or to anyone, really.

But on the bright side, I think that unfortunate experience finally pushed me to look more into skincare. My usual routine wasn't helping with the dryness and I had to act fast. So the ever helpful bloggers and vloggers of the Interwebs became my inner tubes as I dived right in. And I finally decided to try the 5357495-step Korean skincare regimen. ;-)  At first, it sounded intimidating with all those steps (12 at the most; I was kidding with the 5357495 figure lol) and products. I thought - and accepted - that it was going to be a bit pricey and time-consuming. But I was desperate. I needed to get rid of the dry skin fast. Making the switch to this crazy, almost obsessive, skincare regimen is one of the best decisions of my life!

If you feel like you need a primer, go ahead and experiment. Personally, I'm not a fan. I used a very light coverage Western BB cream as "primer" to my foundation and it worked so much better than when I used an actual primer. And guess what, it did not break me out. My tube is still in my collection, eating up precious space. Either I toss it once and for all or maybe it might work on other people. But it's definitely not for me. I'm closing my door on primers. I like my skin to feel like skin and not like there's a layer of wax on it.

I've been on my new skincare routine for a couple of weeks and I am loving it. It does require a bit more dedication than my previous routine - if you can call it that. And also, I'm still experimenting with products. Everything is very new and I'm trying not to be overwhelmed with the variety of products available and figuring out what else I can do. I will share with you my routine on another post. May this one be a cautionary tale.



REVIEW: 2nd Love Cosmetics Luxe Lace Lipsticks

On my 2nd year at IMATS, majority of what I bought are brushes and tools. I only bought makeup from one company. 2nd Love Cosmetics. And guess what I bought... lipsticks.

(My IMATS recap is coming up. I'm just not feeling it yet.)

I love finding diamonds in the rough and 2nd Love Cosmetics is definitely one of them. They're a relatively young company that mostly sells their stuff online on their website. I've also seen them at the Maneki Neko at Little Tokyo. I only have lip products from them though. That is the one makeup item that I can't get enough of. I reviewed their signature lipsticks here.

This time, I checked out their new line of lip color, the Luxe Lace Lipsticks. On the site, they go for $5.59 but at IMATS, they went for 2 for $5. Now that I've swatched them, I'm kicking myself for not getting a bunch more. But here's a 20% coupon code: IMATSLA2015. This is good until the 31st, I think. (Not sponsored; I'm just a good soul sharing the love.)

Let's dig in, shall we? :)


Here's the description from the website:

Luxurious high-impact lipstick with gorgeous rich color for voluptuous and smooth lips. Formulated with Vitamin E and jojoba to hydrate lips.

I agree on all counts. When I first swatched them on my arm, I was surprised at how soft and creamy the formula is and how pigmented it went on after it warmed up a little bit. The Signature Lipsticks were a little bit harder and grittier but no less pigmented. These glided on so smooth and built up nicely.


The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies (2014)



AKA The End of an Age.

Frodo Baggins once said, "I'm glad to be with youSamwise Gamgee, here at the end of all things." Well, Samwise Gamgee wasn't even born yet during the events of The Hobbit. What I'm saying is that I'm glad to be on this journey since it's first steps out the door where it began. (See what I did there?) And of course, all the friends I met along the way. It's like an actual fellowship, you know. Fans of either the book and/or movie will understand the thrill of meeting another person who understands and who is as passionate as you are over something. LOTR is not for everyone (but I try to make everyone watch it anyway) and that feeling of finding someone to talk to about Thranduil, Legolas, Thorin, etc... is just priceless. 

Now, will this be a review? Eh, like I said... I have a hard time reviewing things that I love so no, definitely not a biased review. A recap maybe? Well, I don't think you'd want to read a full on fangirling complete with Tolkien jargon and mythology. A send off? Absolutely not. It may be hashtagged #OneLastTime but it's never really "the last time" with this fandom.

Dracula Untold (2014)


It is no secret that I will watch a movie just for the actor starring in it. (In the case of Sam Worthington, I avoid that movie like a plague.)  Yes, even if it gets lackluster to bad reviews from old men critics. They might see themselves as "authority" but we don't have the same tastes and/or reasons to watch and appreciate a film. They certainly do not watch a movie just because there's a hot guy in it. XD

Well, I'm not above that and have done it before and do it again. This time, it's for Luke Evans. He's the Will Turner doppelganger also seen in The Hobbit movies and Fast & Furious 6. He's also a musical theatre guy. There's something about him that I like so much. I met him in person in the red carpet premiere of Desolation of Smaug and boy, hopefully I can meet him again, and probably ask for a photo. He seems so nice!

I also like the whole vampire topic. Not just the blood-sucking lore but also the factual part about Vlad The Impaler. And yeah, all the other "vampiric" serial killer types like Elizabeth Bathory. That's why I am drawn into historical fiction novels and movies. I'm interested in seeing how they mix historical facts with the creative liberties they take. I'm not always sold but there are times when I enjoy myself so much that I don't even nitpick... much. ;-)



Suffice to say, I was so excited for this movie. Luke Evans plays Vlad the Impaler but he is not portrayed as the worst man ever here. He's a gentle king, even though he impaled his enemies on sticks and let them bleed out on the fields. Apparently, he did that for revenge and to protect his people. He then establishes his family and kingdom until one day, his sort of childhood friend, Sultan Mehmed II (played by Dominic Cooper) decides to change the rules of the agreement. As in the old times, he required 1000 boys for his army, including Vlad's own 10-year-old son as royal hostage. Betrayed, Vlad offers his own self as hostage but was denied. He then seeks the help of an ancient power, a legend in the mountain of something unspeakable and evil.

A Master Vampire (Game of Thrones' Charles Dance) gives Vlad a taste of that power. For three days, he'll be one of the undead and if by that three days he does not consume human blood, he will go back to the land of the living. Here lies the biggest change from popular lore... Vlad does want to go back. He just needed that three days to defend his kingdom. No matter what happened, he never used that power more than he intended. I loved Luke Evans' portrayal of that confused, hesitant, but determined king who only wants the best for his people. Yes, there is implied violence and bloodshed but it falls within the PG-13 rating of the film. So yeah, for a vampire movie, it doesn't have a lot of blood on screen.

For some, it's hard to view a vampire as a good guy; that all the bloodshed is for a greater good. I can see that point. On another day, I might agree with it. But I didn't mind it that much in this movie. I genuinely enjoyed the graphics, the acting, the flow of the story, and music. I admit, I want more blood and gore but as it is, it's not a bad contribution to the vampire genre.

The Maze Runner (2014)




This is one of those full circle moments where related things happen immediately right after the other.  I watched this movie for the second time - yes, twice - on Sunday the 21st with my brother and mother who were also with me during the James Dashner author signing event at Vroman's Bookstore in Pasadena on September 12th.  Aaaand both of them have finished the trilogy whereas I've only read the first one.  It was like with Angels and Demons; all 3 of us read the source material and were looking forward to a discussion about the movie.

During his Q&A, James Dashner joked that he thought the movie was better than the book.  I figured he was saying that in jest to sell the movie and understandably, he was excited.  I shared his excitement because I enjoyed The Maze Runner a lot.  It started off slow for me but in a genre flooded by "strong young female lead characters," we needed to hear from the boys.  Thomas, Minho, Newt, and the rest of the Gladers filled up that void.

I always thought that The Hunger Games movies were better than the books.  Shoot me, it's true.  But did I agree with Mr. Dashner?  Is the movie better than the book in this case?  Yes and no.  There were parts of the book that I felt were important that were left out.  On the other hand, I also understood why they had to take the liberties that they took with the movie.

The Maze Runner to begin with is a rather complex book.  It's not one of those "spoon-fed" YA novels where the author tells you instead of shows you.  It has a lot of words that only make sense in this particular 'verse.  It started off slow with a lot of explanations - what is what, who is who, where is where. Right off the bat, Thomas, our main character, seems different. He's not as passive as the other boys.

I like how the actors brought the characters to life.  I particularly enjoyed Newt (Thomas Brodie-Sangster) and Minho (Ki Hong Lee). The screen lights up whenever either of them are on and man, they are so awesome to watch.  Kaya Scodelario who plays Teresa looks like a Bella Swan double.  She was just... there.  Much of the stuff they left out of the book had something to do with her.  Blake Cooper as Chuck was just delightful.  It's like book!Chuck jumped off the page on to the screen.  The other Gladers were like Teresa... they were just there.  There's this one kid who had lines but for the life of me, I could not remember his name.  Eh.  And as for Thomas (Dylan O'Brien), he was okay.  I never had a clear picture of Thomas in my head anyway.

What I liked the most was the editing and pacing.  For a movie with "runner" in the name, they did well on the pace of the film.  The book runs a bit slow and steady but that might not translate well on screen.  In that case, I agreed with one huge change that they did for the adaptation. The actual running sequences were great.  The maze came alive on screen very well.  Minho, oh oppa... XD  The actor portrayed that confident but not cocky demeanor so well.  I also liked their costumes.  It felt functional and every main character had a distinct look.

However, I pictured a different look for the Grievers.  In my head, it was a cross between a jelly blob and Final Fantasy VIII's monster, X-ATM092.  The ones in the movie, I thought, were too skinny and small.  They were fierce but rather smaller than what I expected.  But hey, what do I know?

Overall, I genuinely enjoyed it.  It's no Hunger Games but it is more enjoyable than Divergent.  Would I watch it again?  Absolutely!

Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014)

I admit, the trailers looked really awesome.  The absence of Megan Fox and Shia LaBitch were definitely welcomed.  I do like Marky Mark.  And it's been a while since I saw a Michael Bay master-tastrophe. (I totally skipped the 3rd Transformers movie because of that model lady they replaced Megan Fox with. I mean, Megan can't act for shit but that model can't even move her face.)  Taking all of that into consideration, I should enjoy this 4th one, yes?

Eh... at least it had Ken Watanabe.  It really did!

Since I have no idea what happened in Transformers: Dark of the Moon, it was like watching a whole new Transformers franchise.  I am a fan of the animated series that aired when I was a kid but not much of the live action movies because of the human cast.  The robots are great.  I even have a friend who "confessed" that she thought that Optimus Prime is "hot".  And she meant in semi-truck form.


Yeah.  I don't even know.

But Optimus Prime is pretty cool.  I've always liked him and Bumblebee and his unassuming and naughty demeanor.  Until Ken Watanabe's Drift came along.  Yes, he became my new favorite because of Watanabe-san.  And he reminded me of Tekken's Yoshimitsu.

The other bots are just fantastic.  If they can do away with the humans in these movies, I might like them more.  The problem with this installment is the romantic BS they felt they had to inject.  Mark Wahlberg plays Cade Yeager (insert all Pacific Rim jokes here) and he is a Stu Pickles-like inventor in the middle of nowhere Texas.  He has a 17-year-old brat named Tessa (Nicola Peltz).  Throughout the movie, she's this useless little bitch who cared nada for her dad and obsessed over her Liam Hemsworth look alike boyfriend, Shane (Jack Reynor).  A word of note to all females cast in any Transformers movie, throw yourself in the way of two bots next time; y'all of practically useful only to annoy the audiences.

Cade then happens to come across a rundown Mater-like truck that lay abandoned in a condemned building.  And yay, it's Optimus Prime in "disguise".  As Mater.  LOL.  He then uses that energy-sapping trick they do to transform into that sexy semi-truck again.  Calling all Autobots... Aaah, it gets me going every time!

My problem with it... or should I say, PROBLEMS, are writing, editing, and humans.  In pretty much that order.  All of the stuff they gave to the Yeager side of the story was cringe-worthy.  That made the acting not convincing and painful to watch.  The Tessa character, omg... just... I was happy when her part was reduced to almost nothing towards the end.  I didn't mind Shane because he was just... there.  And he looked like a Hemsworth brother.

What is it with these women in action movies anyway?  Their nail polish stay pristine; they don't sweat; they don't get bruises after being banged up in concrete, glass, and hard dirt.  Naomi Watts rolled around in the forest in King Kong but her dress remained relatively clean.  Tessa's hair flew this way and that but still fell nicely around her shoulders.  I'd be lucky to have my hair flat down on my head after a strong gale.

But I digress.

The editing made my head hurt.  OMG.  Maybe because it had too many fillers that scene changes seemed irrelevant to each other or done very poorly. The first part was worse than the second half.  It was choppy.  It got better towards the end because the storylines merged into one or two.

The Dinobots were... what were they for?  Optimus Prime had a ROTK!Aragorn moment while riding Grimlock.  "Fight for me, and I will hold your oaths fulfilled," type of thing.  They all came out of nowhere and yeah.  That was it.  Galvatron/Megatron is still pretty stupid, by the way.

Transformers: Age of Extinction was needlessly long.  Michael Bay got a wee bit carried away with all the Michael Bay-isms.  I felt the urge to exclaim "Michael Bay!" at every explosion... which I think I did.  If the guy is known for one thing, it's explosions.


(Yes.  That is a Miley Cyrus gif on my blog.  Feel free to take a cleansing shower afterwards.)

Anyway.  It was long.  I'm no stranger to 3-hour movies but LOTR and Marvel stuff are pretty much exceptions to every rule.  This one made me tired with all the bot fighting and destruction of China and explosions. Which would've been okay if not for the stupid breaks that had the human characters spew out some stupid "No, Daddy. I love him and I hate you" bull shit.  That got old so fast.

A 5th one is confirmed.  That means more Optimus Prime and more Bee.  But Primus forbid, more Tessa?  Please, no.  Send her off to college and may we never hear from her again.

Although, I have a sinking feeling that her college car will be Bumblebee.  DX